|
1
|
- Camilla Elliott
- St Joseph’s College – Mildura
- Research, Evidence and Engaging Learning
SLAV Conference - 5 September, 2003
- www.linkingforlearning.com
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- The primary purpose of assessment should be to improve student learning:
- Assessments should allow reasonable judgment to be made about the
extent to which the student has achieved the intended outcomes; in
addition, assessment should support learning and not undermine it.
- (Nightingale, 1996)
|
|
4
|
- Previously
- Word documents
- Excel
- Publisher
- Sim City
- Posters
- Today
- Web pages
- Video clips
- Visual Diagrams
- Hyperstudio
- Powerpoint
- Mixed media presentations
- Email discussions
|
|
5
|
- A rubric is a tool for
assessing instruction and performance according to predetermined
expectations and criteria.
- Sample
|
|
6
|
- Clarify targets of instruction, esp. complex tasks – no “mystery”
- Provide valid and reliable assessment of student learning
- Develop both teacher and student confidence
- Improve student motivation and achievement by defining the nature of
quality performance
|
|
7
|
- A matrix/list of stated objectives or criteria against which students
will be assessed
- A numerical or comment range which rates student performance
- A description for each level indicating the degree to which
students have satisfied the set criteria
|
|
8
|
- Active involvement of student with teacher to set the assessment
criteria
- Ownership of the learning established
- Focus on what is important
- Strategies, skills and opportunities to evaluate their own learning
- Individualised to suit ability & learning style
- Rubric distributed with the task
|
|
9
|
- Helps to determine teaching effectiveness – what approaches and methods
work?
- Helps to determine whether the program is achieving desired goals
- Is a tool for communicating to others
- Removes subjectivity
- Creates professional consistency
|
|
10
|
- Clarifies understanding of expectations from the beginning
- Promotes student awareness about the criteria to be used when assessing
peer performance
- Provides benchmarks against which to measure and document student
progress
- Aids empowerment
|
|
11
|
- Determine learning outcomes
- Keep it short and simple (include 4-15 items/ statements)
- Each rubric item should focus on a different skill
- Focus on how students develop and express their learning
- Evaluate only measurable criteria, clarifying value of options
|
|
12
|
- Ideally, the entire rubric should fit on one sheet of paper
- Re-evaluated the rubric after use (Did it work? Was it detailed enough?)
|
|
13
|
- Gather student work samples & sort samples into 3 - 4 groups
- Record your own descriptive statements & categorise into critical
performance elements
- Write an operational definitions of each element
- Select the "best match" of student work per each level of
performance--i.e.exemplary, proficient, basic, novice
- Repeat steps . . . refine
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- Bellanca, J., Chapman, C., Swartz, E. (1997) Multiple assessments for
multiple intelligences. Hawker
Brownlow Education.
- Berman, Sally. (2000) Project learning for the multiple intelligences
classroom. Pearson Education
Education Australia.
- Burke, Kay. (1999) The mindful school: how to assess authentic
learning. (3rd ed).
Hawker Brownlow Education.
- Fogarty, R. & Stoehr, J. (1994) Integrating curricula with multiple
intelligences: themes, teams & threads. Hawker Brownlow Education
|
|
16
|
|