Evaluation Rubric for Touring Antarctica Webquest
 
  
Beginning

1

Developing

2

Accomplished

3

Score

Individual Research

 

Cuts and pastes notes from web.

Minimal use of questions provided to  find information 

Clear learning on the topic has taken place. 

  There's an ability to discuss the topic using examples or evidence

New information has been firmly connected to previous related knowledge.  Easy use of evidence shows sound understanding.
 

Group Synthesis



 

Ideas are put together but don't necessarily focus on the outcome of developing a report regarding the environmental impact of the trekking tour.
The group decision is based on clear understantding of key issues and works to balance them. 
This group decision is soundly reasoned and addresses the key issue of the effect of this trekking tour on Antarctica.
 

Final Presentation



 

Presenters give minimal evidence to support their report. 

Limited team conclusion.

Presenters understand their role and have some some valid conclusions.

Evidence of a team discussion and conclusion.

Presenters give a clear and comprehensive report reflecting their understanding of the role of the team in producing a report to reflect the interests of all interest groups
 

 

Individual mark: Tour Operator 1 .................................................... 2........................................................
  Scientist 1....................................................... 2.......................................................
  Environmentalist 1....................................................... 2 ......................................................
  Politician 1 ...................................................... 2 ......................................................

Back to Teacher Notes

Adapted from Web'n'flow - Tom March

© Camilla Elliott
St Joseph's College, Mildura